The Anti-Imperialist The Pitfalls of Black Nationalism

In his latest column, Ceasefire associate editor Adam Elliott-Cooper looks at Black nationalism, an intrinsic aspect of the anti-imperialist struggle. Many contemporary social movements across the Global South, he argues, are problematising the nationalism of the past, and finding new focal points and organising methods to resist modern-day imperialism.

New in Ceasefire, The Anti-Imperialist - Posted on Sunday, March 6, 2011 0:00 - 2 Comments

Share
The Poor Peoples Alliance follow the route of the 1976 Soweto Uprising

National consciousness, instead of being the all-embracing crystallisation of the innermost hopes of the whole people, instead of being the immediate and most obvious result of the mobilisation of the people, will be in any case only an empty shell, a crude and fragile travesty of what it might have been” – Frantz Fanon (1961)

The anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa was famously led to victory by the African National Congress (ANC). The ANC membership was made up of communists and social democrats in addition to ex-business leaders and entrepreneurs. The unifying banner, under which they all stood, was undoubtedly that of Black Nationalism – taking strength and direction from their shared suffering as a racial group and using it to build a new nation on the ruins of the racially divided South Africa. Dumisani Makhaye, longstanding member of the ANC National Executive Committee explains, “in the underground…

If information got into the wrong hands it could cause problems for the movement… People had full confidence in the leadership. They believed that even if they did not have all the information, the leaders who did had the best intentions”.

The ideology of the ANC, although diverse, carried a consistently elite vanguardist thread – Govan Mbeki’s prison writings present a guide as to how a political movement involved dividing communities into subsections, so that even “the task of organising the migrants in the hostels must necessarily fall upon the ANC” .

To attain these and other goals, the ANC developed joint co-ordinating committees and planning councils to plan campaigns and actions, selecting certain members of communities to become involved whilst “hundreds and thousands of potential resisters were turned away by Congress officials” according to the firsthand account of longstanding trade union leader Naboth Mokgatle.

Abahlali baseMjondolo organising meeting

The ANC thus constructed a rigid bureaucratic hierarchy whilst operating as a liberation movement. However, many found it difficult to adjust to the requirements of accountability and electoral input which were absent when the ANC was under ground.

Trevor Ngwane notes that when apartheid fell: “The returning ANC leadership started by closing down the other structures, in the name of unity: ‘Why do you need your own Youth Congress? We have the Youth League’; ‘Why do you need the Transvaal Federation of Women?”.

Internal democracy and accountability have also been lacking in the post-apartheid ANC government. Multiple government departments were consolidated into a small number of committees, all co-ordinated and controlled from the president’s office.

The ideology of hierarchy and centralised power has been most damaging however, economically. In 2007, South Africa created 5,073 new dollar millionaires, many of whom have strong links with the ANC and the policy of privatisation and deregulation – the source of their vast wealth. But at the same time unemployment reached 48% and twenty-two million South Africans now live in abject poverty, with 4 million living on less than $1 a day according to analysts such as William Gumede and Naomi Klein. In response, those betrayed by the promises of the ANC have built an alliance which challenges not only economic inequality, but the ideology of hierarchical power relations.

These organisations work under the umbrella of the Poor People’s Alliance, who have developed the race politics of Black Nationalism to incorporate all power relations, such as gender and class. They have been inspired by resisters to imperialism in Mexico, such as the Zapatistas and those in Brazil like MST.

They have gone to great lengths to ensure that their organisations do not construct hierarchies which can lead to the huge democratic deficits displayed in the ANC. Zikode of Abahlali baseMjondolo (AbM) explains that “some NGOs and some academics still believe that social change cannot come from the bottom and still believe that democracy is all about being loyal to their authority …it is an insult to assume that poor people cannot think for themselves, that someone else must talk for them without their concern”.

The principle that all individuals in an organisation or collective should have equal input and agency is central to these groups. For AbM, this takes place at weekly meetings in which issues are discussed, and outsiders can propose building links with the movement if they are willing to “negotiate this with the movement’s democratic structures – all of which are always open to all”.

Meeting to Build a Consensus in Support of Participatory Upgrades in the Cities & Against Forced Removals to Rural Dumping Grounds

AbM state their commitment to regular and direct accountability to those “elected, mandated and rotated whom at least half of the people elected to fulfil these responsibilities are women” .

They go on to maintain that “[p]eople elected into office are not elected to make decisions on particular issues but rather to ensure a democratic decision making process”. Raj Patel notes that representatives at meetings “arrive with a mandate and return with a detailed report” and “[f]rom the very outset, leadership has been from the base”.

The autonomous groups in the Poor People’s Alliance are represented by 10,000s of poor South Africans, employing many of the tactics of the ANC during apartheid – utilising the courts, international solidarity and direct action to great effect. But their internal structures are horizontal and directly democratic, problematising all power relations.

It is this progress which enables them to work towards a South Africa which represents all those who have fought to make it a genuine symbol of Black liberation in the 20th Century and beyond.  Our brothers and sisters in South Africa can teach us a lot about how Black nationalism can lead us astray in our fight against imperialism, but more importantly, their current work teaches us how the analytical tools which problemitise power structures can create a sophisticated and encompassing approach to resistance to oppression in all its forms.

“When the Mountain Meets its Shadow” – the trailer for a documentary on the struggles and resistance in South Africa today

Adam Elliott-Cooper, a writer and activist, is Ceasefire Associate Editor. His column on race politics appears every other Sunday. He tweets at @adamec87.

Share

2 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Farooq
Mar 7, 2011 1:45

very good article, thanks. Sometimes people can focus too much on victory, and ignore the structures of oppression they are creating in order to ‘win’

anthony kalu
Mar 7, 2011 14:35

accountability

Leave a Reply

Comment

 

More Ideas

More In Politics

More In Features

More In Profiles

More In Arts & Culture